From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Tables and environment with parameters Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 06:43:16 +0200 Message-ID: <04A67F11-90B3-40D6-88CB-3B7D3572BE47@gmail.com> References: <87eifxjv28.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87eifr8c1e.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87631095oi.fsf@mundaneum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60901 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OUY5y-00005e-GV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:43:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUY5x-0007L2-5W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:43:22 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:56574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OUY5w-0007Kw-Vf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:43:21 -0400 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so1144203ewy.0 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:43:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87631095oi.fsf@mundaneum.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9bastien_Vauban?= Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Sebastian, this might have been fixed, can you please check? Thanks - Carsten On Jun 30, 2010, at 12:27 PM, S=E9bastien Vauban wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > Carsten Dominik wrote: >> On Jun 28, 2010, at 4:30 PM, S=E9bastien Vauban wrote: >>> Carsten Dominik wrote: >>>> On Jun 23, 2010, at 11:30 PM, S=E9bastien Vauban wrote: >>>> >>>>> Since one of the last updates -- I guess --, I now have a problem >>>>> exporting the tables: I see the meta-tags in the PDF output! =20 >>>>> Very new... >>> >>> Though, in the meanwhile, note that this is not as bad as it could =20= >>> be: in >>> fact, I'd love to be able to print (when I want it, though) some =20 >>> of the >>> table meta-information, such as table name and formulas. >>> >>> That'd be great to see that, at certain times, in the output PDF =20 >>> -- would >>> we be able to customize its font size or so. >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> Actually, what are meta tags? > > I mean that the following Org source extract: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > #+BEGIN_shaded > #+ATTR_LaTeX: align=3Dlrr > | Code | =20 > \EUR | (%) | > |--------------------------------------------------------=20 > +---------+------| > | 650-96 (recettes brutes) | =20 > 2660.00 | | > | 657-89 (frais professionnels r=E9els) | =20 > 755.37 | 28.4 | > | 668-78 (recettes d'ind=E9pendant =E0 titre compl=E9mentaire) | =20= > 2660.00 | | > #+TBLFM: @2$2=3Dremote(Recettes_Brutes_NVE,$Total);%.=20 > 2f::@3$2=3Dremote(Frais_Pro_NVE,$Total);%.2f::@3$3=3D100*@3$2/@2$2;%.=20= > 1f::@4$2=3D@2$2;%.2f > #+END_shaded > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > gets displayed like this (with a yellow background) in the PDF: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > #+ATTR_LaTeX: align=3Dlrr > | Code | =20 > \EUR | (%) | > |--------------------------------------------------------=20 > +---------+------| > | 650-96 (recettes brutes) | =20 > 2660.00 | | > | 657-89 (frais professionnels r=E9els) | =20 > 755.37 | 28.4 | > | 668-78 (recettes d'ind=E9pendant =E0 titre compl=E9mentaire) | =20= > 2660.00 | | > #+TBLFM: @2$2=3Dremote(Recettes_Brutes_NVE,$Total);%.=20 > 2f::@3$2=3Dremote(Frais_Pro_NVE,$Total);%.2f::@3$3=3D100*@3$2/@2$2;%.=20= > 1f::@4$2=3D@2$2;%.2f > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > What I called "meta-tags" are the two lines `#+ATTR_LaTeX:' and `#=20 > +TBLFM:' > that weren't visible in the PDF before... Maybe I should say "table > properties". > > So, as I said, for checking purpose, or for giving more information =20= > (about the > formulas) to the reader, that's no so bad to see that, when asked for. > > Of course, it should be formatted properly, and not interpreted as =20 > pure LaTeX. > In my example, in the PDF, Brutes is written in subscript because of =20= > the > underscore in front of it. > > Best regards, > Seb > > --=20 > S=E9bastien Vauban > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode - Carsten