From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederick Giasson Subject: Re: [PATCH] New header parameter :show-process for Org-babel-clojure Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:12:51 -0500 Message-ID: <1339fd1b-c946-ac03-7ce8-0f82ac2de8a5@fgiasson.com> References: <036bf007-5e9c-310c-5bf8-0660c1b96a5c@fgiasson.com> <87lgwrgy7z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <794c93aa-e2dc-2bfb-537e-0c89d8d34cea@fgiasson.com> <878tslp4ha.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <27089048-9dab-747f-51dc-20006717866e@fgiasson.com> <87inrlogee.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46387) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7kqZ-0006kX-Lf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:13:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7kqV-0003My-IY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:12:59 -0500 Received: from s052.panelboxmanager.com ([72.55.186.33]:57527) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c7kqV-0003LT-Ex for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:12:55 -0500 Received: from mailnull by s052.panelboxmanager.com with sa-checked (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c7kqS-003Esd-It for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:12:53 -0500 Received: from modemcable199.69-130-66.mc.videotron.ca ([66.130.69.199]:55168 helo=[192.168.0.199]) by s052.panelboxmanager.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1c7kqS-003Es7-BI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:12:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87inrlogee.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nicolas, > In end of data: > ob-clojure.el:180:1:Warning: the following functions are not known to be > defined: nrepl-request:eval, nrepl--merge, nrepl-dict-put > > Could you look into it? In particular, "nrepl--merge" looks like an > internal function from nrepl. Is it safe to use it? Yes, these functions are part of Cider's nrepl. Yes, they should be safe. Also, they are only used in a context where the code block uses Cider as the backend, so I guess it is right to use them in that context. Thoughts? Thanks, Fred