From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Re: Bug: create latex png while export to HTML become very slow [6.35i] Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:42:37 -0400 Message-ID: <14696.1271457757@alphaville.usa.hp.com> References: <87ochkacxm.fsf@gmail.com> <8D636DAF-5D4C-4846-A432-7B544131B50D@gmail.com> <10559.1271390362@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87iq7rm5xh.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <13511.1271454603@alphaville.usa.hp.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O2uFJ-0000ZA-01 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:42:45 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33540 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2uFF-0000Z1-VG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:42:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2uFD-0002pY-Uw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:42:41 -0400 Received: from g6t0186.atlanta.hp.com ([15.193.32.63]:4446) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2uFD-0002pC-RL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 18:42:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from Carsten Dominik of "Fri, 16 Apr 2010 23:52:20 +0200." List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Bernt Hansen , nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Lucas Peng Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On Apr 16, 2010, at 11:50 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: > > > Bernt Hansen wrote: > > > >> Lucas Peng writes: > >> > >>> Thanks for your prompt response, > >>> > >>> 1. I get "Org-mode version 6.35i" with M-x org-version. > >> > >> Strange. The current latest tagged version in the git repo is > >> release_6.35g > >> > >> We haven't gotten to 'i' yet unless you've come back from the > >> future ;) > >> > > > > I was confused by that too, but the tarball on the website says > > 6.35i, so > > my guess was that Carsten forgot to add tags to the git tree. > > > The tags are there, but I pushed them from a branch. > > Indeed they are. I did ``git fetch --tags'' to get them. Thanks, Nick