Re: [PATCH] Let radio target works well with Chinese

[tumashu <tumashu@163.com>]

At 2019-02-26 03:50:37, "Eric Abrahamsen" <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> wrote:
>Emilio Francesquini <e.francesquini@ufabc.edu.br> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> <<<天空>>>
>>> >
>>> > 我爱天空和大地
>>> >     ^^^^
>>>
>>> Org doesn't support mid-word radio targets. Is there any strong reason
>>> to make a case for Chinese? What about other languages?
>>>
>>
>> My knowledge in Chinese is rather limited, but if it is a little like
>> Japanese the problem is that those languages do not use spaces to separate
>> words.
>>
>> I found myself in the same situation writing radio targets in Japanese...
>> My workaroud was to insert artificial spaces as needed... :/
>
>I've gotten this information (does-space-separate-words) for specific
>characters before using either of these two methods:
>
>(aref (char-category-set ?b) ?|) => nil
>(aref (char-category-set ?中) ?|) => t
>
>(aref fill-nospace-between-words-table?b) => nil
>(aref fill-nospace-between-words-table ?中) => t
>
>| is the category character for "line breakable". Perhaps adding "\c|"
>to the regexp would DTRT?

Seem to be a good idea :-)

>
>Eric
>