From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Hellekin O. Wolf" Subject: Re: AutOrg, and practice of GTD in a group Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:00:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20100624130005.GB920@now.cepheide.org> References: <20100622211941.GF520@now.cepheide.org> <87wrtqqmi5.fsf@gmx.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35977 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ORm2d-00033n-Cm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:00:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORm2c-0008V1-09 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:00:27 -0400 Received: from ks2014849.kimsufi.com ([91.121.123.30]:42822 helo=kappa.cepheide.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORm2b-0008UJ-ON for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:00:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wrtqqmi5.fsf@gmx.ch> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sven Bretfeld Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Wow, thank you Sven... On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 08:41:22AM +0200, Sven Bretfeld wrote: > > The third level is for the physical actions of the project. As you see, > only the first has a todo keyword (NEXT). The others are dependent from > the first (cannot be done before the first is done) and have only a > context tag. My context tags include things like HOME, OFFICE, SHOPPING, > TRAIN etc. When the first NEXT action is done, the next NEXT action in > the list gains the NEXT todo keyword automatically; this is what the > TRIGGER property cares for. In that way my Agenda Views (defined as > NEXT/HOME, NEXT/OFFICE etc.) display only next actions that can be done > immediately. > *** I like the concept of "chained actions" and the TRIGGER property. Very smart, the auto-assignment to NEXT keeps you busy and focused, and saves a number of key-strokes. But I guess that implies multiple NEXT items. Do you maintain several of those, or one per project? Maybe I'm wrong--I didn't even read the GTD book thoroughly yet--but I like having *one* NEXT action, so that I don't get stuck with too many "next" things. I can understand one NEXT action per project, but several within a single project raises internal warnings. > As I'm working in a team, I have long searched for a way to tell Orgmode > who is with me at a certain moment and display the things that have to > be done together with the(se) person(s). I have recently discovered > org-secretary for that purpose. For the above case, if Volkard enters my > office, I tell Emacs that he is now with me, and a special agenda view > displays all the things I want to do with him. This is what the "dowith" > property is for. > *** All right, so I'm looking up org-secretary.el. I like this approach. > Apart from PROJECTS and contexts I have two more tags defined: BIGROCK > and MIT. The first is given to projects that I want to concentrate on > this week (never more than 3 projects contain that tag). MIT means "Most > Important Thing (of the day)". I use this tag to mark three to four NEXT > actions every night. These are the first things I care for on the next > day. > *** So you do maintain multiple NEXT actions per project? Thank you again for your invaluable input. == hk