From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Bausch <DanielBausch@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Standardized code block keywords
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:41:55 +0200
Message-ID: <201110260741.56064.DanielBausch@gmx.de>
References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <201110250914.29233.DanielBausch@gmx.de>
	<8739eh3v57.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42292)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <DanielBausch@gmx.de>) id 1RIwFS-0006OD-88
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:41:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <DanielBausch@gmx.de>) id 1RIwFR-0004Bw-B2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:41:58 -0400
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:37940)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <DanielBausch@gmx.de>) id 1RIwFQ-0004Bq-Ue
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 01:41:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8739eh3v57.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

> > However, I'd like to ask, what happens, if one refers to a
> > name of a source block where data is expected, does it then refer to
> > the results produced by that source block?  How are such situations
> > handeled at the moment?
> 
> Try it out, but be ready to press C-g, because I would guess that it
> results in an infinite loop.

Isn't it possible to refer to the results of a code block as input data for 
another?  I thought it was.  If not currently then at least I suppose that it 
will be in the future.  The new syntax should be ready for that.

Daniel