From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id sEAJGqKwxF9bCAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:43:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 6LmxFaKwxF9iRQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:43:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCDFC940148 for ; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 08:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41288 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjem7-0000wW-KE for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 03:43:11 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjelI-0000uC-GF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 03:42:20 -0500 Received: from mail.tuxteam.de ([5.199.139.25]:41676) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kjelF-00021C-Py for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 03:42:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tuxteam.de; s=mail; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:Date; bh=ac8kUsRqH5yaZLcWXMfax+gyBr9DyFzUJNlhZGV8/Pc=; b=NlNW2JbIKaK1cmGb6RBpNsgPFuDgDlChS13EigfdbPMxT1BsroEMs5MgJFdMhFrqgOS/23OUlvtplX0ksTIDzd/LgFX56Ba3LLr1KsYr6ii9o/ELtJt/hUxg50/lWn2eODaLjH09YCKQvtfMm93MxfD86E6iZuIAVH9u2muCk6yz7h+MR9qSOfhYVW6pYngjppNSYFyZbEvieISVtwrCp5dWx/jpmTlAOVtz8ZlQN9hMO9mCfXoYdXV6bBbtiIuA/hn/bs3xLIjLTMHzsiCwcyoS//ogc5NFOnZ5utpo0djKt7/tg9fgUs8zmU1vghU5+1upA/ZXFqkYvzaJShwIUA==; Received: from tomas by mail.tuxteam.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1kjel4-0001DC-3E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:42:06 +0100 Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 09:42:01 +0100 To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#44935: Emacs inserts hardwired org-agenda-files variable, overwriting user options Message-ID: <20201130084200.GA2954@tuxteam.de> References: <837dq4mcb1.fsf@gnu.org> <87tut7yb6i.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T4sUOijqQbZv57TR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) From: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=5.199.139.25; envelope-from=tomas@tuxteam.de; helo=mail.tuxteam.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.58 X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tuxteam.de header.s=mail header.b=NlNW2JbI; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-TUID: Xyt78MlB+Srm --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:05:15AM +0100, Christopher Dimech wrote: [...] > Please follow the commentary in savannah-hackers > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/savannah-hackers/2020-11/msg00085.h= tml >=20 > I agree fully with Falcon's description. Just from a sideline: "Falcon's description" pointing to a huge post with many aspects, some related to here, and some not, doesn't seem helpful to focus here. Could you state your point (as far as it is related to the current thread's topic) in a couple of sentences? Thanks - t --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAl/EsFgACgkQBcgs9XrR2kYaHgCfd6w/11XA+yhUoyqKuRt+eA5e IkIAnROqijCSgXRez9o6as2DhpsbX7R0 =trgy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T4sUOijqQbZv57TR--