From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: commenting out a SCHEDULED line does not remove todo from agenda. Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:47:17 -0500 Message-ID: <20573.1358437637@alphaville> References: <8696.1358358500@alphaville> <16014.1358398925@alphaville> <717C030F-136F-46CA-B0C0-5F9CB3560921@gmail.com> <17512.1358412853@alphaville> <3FCB9B91-63EA-4443-A56C-F6BB80AED2D6@gmail.com> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvrgX-0001C9-2t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:47:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvrgW-0004Sy-0X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:47:20 -0500 Received: from g4t0015.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.18]:28307) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TvrgV-0004Sn-R3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:47:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message from Carsten Dominik of "Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:42:23 +0100." <3FCB9B91-63EA-4443-A56C-F6BB80AED2D6@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Rainer Stengele , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On 17.1.2013, at 09:54, Nick Dokos wrote: > > > ... > > I tried with my agenda which calls org-agenda-skip 5768 times. Without > > the mod, they took 0.13s; with the mod, they took 0.19s, so that's a 50% > > increase - but the overall time was actually shorter in the second case: > > 1.64s vs 1.72s. > > Did you have a number of commented SCHEDULED items in there, so that > time was saved on those items? Otherwise it would be hard to see why > things should actually go faster. No, I just ran it on my standard items which do not include any commmented SCHEDULED items. It may have been just scheduling delays because of all the *other* things running on my laptop, or there may have been caching effects - or I may have screwed up. As I said, I would have to do many more (and more careful) experiments before I'd trust these numbers. Nick