From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Org-mode version 5.13 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:42:13 +0200 Message-ID: <3BA1CB6B-5943-465C-A466-DA1B7BDC38F8@science.uva.nl> References: <877ili13ju.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20071022223824.119eace4@newmanfamily.me.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IkjJQ-0007aw-Vf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:42:33 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IkjJP-0007Z4-9G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:42:32 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkjJO-0007Yb-QH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:42:31 -0400 Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.237]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IkjJN-0007U0-E4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:42:30 -0400 Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 23so253281huc for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:42:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20071022223824.119eace4@newmanfamily.me.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mike Newman Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org So, does everybody agree that I should remove the class from the divs again? - Carsten On Oct 22, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Mike Newman wrote: > On Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:30:29 +0100 > Bastien wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> Carsten Dominik writes: >> >>> - The table of context is wrapped into a div with a class >>> "table-of-contents". >> >> This should be "id", not "class", since there is only one instance of >> the table of contents - fixed in the proposed patch. > > I think that class is the right thing here. We are saying that > this is > a "table-of-contents" rather than this is the "table-of-contents". I > believe at present there is no mechanism to give more than one > table of > contents, but someone, sometime might want tables of contents for > individual sections of a document. > >> >>> - The outline structure is embedded in
elements with >>> classes "outline-1", "outline-2" etc. >> >> Classes are ok here. >> > > This appears to be logical, but is in fact (I think) redundant. We > can > specify the style to applied at different levels without using > class attributes. For example: > > div { background-color: lightgray} > div > div { background-color: peachpuff} > div > div > div { background-color: green} > > shows how different styling can be applied to level 1, level 2 and > level 3 (and above). > > I think this has advantages (e.g. inheritance of unspecified > characteristics from higher levels) and leaves the class attribute > free > to represent styling that is independent of the structure. > > -- > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode