From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Max Rydahl Andersen" Subject: Re: avoiding "First item of list cannot move without its subtree" Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:50:42 +0100 Message-ID: <46BC26A2-1E9D-4A32-AD6E-384EB76A60E5@redhat.com> References: <2F92B854-9322-45EA-8753-A6CAA3717974@redhat.com> <87h93oygic.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tw7ovvkc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <31A5D5FB-7629-4A6A-9727-D419A7D8096D@redhat.com> <87d1ebtpkh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <627E7E70-7578-4B73-A6A7-2ABFAD907AFB@redhat.com> <87wpcifpw6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <0F884889-BCEB-4CDD-B421-9977106ACB72@redhat.com> <87efypf82i.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; markup=markdown Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42777) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgsrC-00050z-90 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:50:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgsr9-000379-60 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:50:50 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:36869) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cgsr8-00036k-Vh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:50:47 -0500 Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id v77so10164161wmv.0 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 04:50:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87efypf82i.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Org-mode On 23 Feb 2017, at 12:41, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > "Max Rydahl Andersen" writes: > >> Fixed the typo - but still nothing happens :/ > > "Nothing happens" is a bit vague. M-S-Left should demote an item. When > it reaches top-level, it should be turned into a headline. What > happens > instead? The same as before, i.e. I observe no difference. Here is a screencast of me trying before and after evaluating buffer with the function in it. https://v.usetapes.com/COVDzfByN0 /max http://about.me/maxandersen