From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: footnote bug Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 09:06:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4D9DD28B-374B-4651-B5BF-4CBDE77C579F@gmail.com> References: <20524da70903261321w67170dfcseb8f0d0b70e466e1@mail.gmail.com> <20524da70904012253m5c5af1ffsbad6cbdcf2340608@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LpHid-0004dV-K0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:52:11 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LpHiY-0004bW-HM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:52:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37207 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LpHiY-0004bT-B0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:52:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f160.google.com ([209.85.219.160]:61184) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LpHiX-00059v-Nx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:52:06 -0400 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so426602ewy.42 for ; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 00:52:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20524da70904012253m5c5af1ffsbad6cbdcf2340608@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Samuel Wales Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Apr 2, 2009, at 7:53 AM, Samuel Wales wrote: > Hi Carsten, > > I figured that you had already optimized the agenda quite a lot and > that there probably wasn't much that could be done, so I suggested the > only thing that seemed like it might be fast and would not be too > brittle. I didn't realize the code would need to be rewritten. > > For me, everything in the agenda is slow that requires refreshing or > creating a view. I don't know how to be more specific. Hi Samuel, does it make a noticeable difference when you turn off org-use-tag- inheritance ? - Carsten > > > On 2009-03-30, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> Hi Samuel, >> >> caching stuff for the agenda would mean rewriting the agenda code. >> >> Do you have more detailed pointers what operations exactly are slow? >> Maybe we can profile and improve these without resorting to cacheing. >> >> - Carsten >> >> On Mar 26, 2009, at 9:21 PM, Samuel Wales wrote: >> >>> The following source produces the following output. >>> >>> ************* sorting speed >>>>> The agenda is wonderful for other stuff, but for me it is >>>>> not an editing mode per se. I have never been able to use >>>>> the agenda for full control over the org file, as some >>>>> people are able to do. For me (at least on my computer) it >>>>> is slow. >>>> >>>> What is "slow". Maybe we can improve things? >>> >>> You could use cached values for agenda files whose last >>> update time is earlier than the last agenda scan. That >>> could lead to significant speedups for people who have >>> several agenda files.[fn:15] >>> >>> [fn:15] It wouldn't help with people who have a single >>> agenda file, and it wouldn't help with people who very >>> frequently use all of their agenda files. For those use >>> cases, something much more complicated and brittle would >>> probably be necessary >>> >>> >>> Output: >>> >>> You could use cached values for agenda files whose last >>> update time is earlier than the last agenda scan. That >>> could lead to significant speedups for people who have >>> several agenda files.[1] >>> [fn:15] It wouldn't help with people who have a single >>> agenda file, and it wouldn't help with people who very >>> frequently use all of their agenda files. For those use >>> cases, something much more complicated and brittle would >>> probably be necessary >>> [1] [fn:15] >>> >>> -- >>> Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death (decades early; >>> Jason et al. 2006) and severe suffering (worse than nearly all other >>> diseases studied; e.g. Schweitzer et al. 1995) and grossly >>> corrupting >>> science. http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/What_Is_ME_What_Is_CFS.htm >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list >>> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. >>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode >> >> > > > -- > Myalgic encephalomyelitis denialism is causing death (decades early; > Jason et al. 2006) and severe suffering (worse than nearly all other > diseases studied; e.g. Schweitzer et al. 1995) and grossly corrupting > science. http://www.meactionuk.org.uk/What_Is_ME_What_Is_CFS.htm