From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rainer Stengele Subject: Re: `f' in agenda view Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:38:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4E96B1A5.3050300@online.de> References: <4E96A594.30102@online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1REHka-0004bB-Cq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 05:38:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1REHkZ-00007h-17 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 05:38:52 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:64590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1REHkY-00007M-Io for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 05:38:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E96A594.30102@online.de> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Cc: John Wiegley , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Am 13.10.2011 10:47, schrieb Rainer Stengele: > Am 04.10.2011 23:04, schrieb John Wiegley: >>>>>>> Dave Abrahams writes: >> >>> It always strikes me as odd that `f' in agenda view moves the item forward >>> by a day even if that leaves it still in the past. Typically if I have an >>> overdue item, I just want to schedule it for today or a certain number of >>> days in the future, and as it stands it's even a bit non-obvious when I've >>> finally bumped it up to today if it's a few days old. Shouldn't the first >>> `f' on an overdue item schedule it for today? >> >> Just to clarify, by 'f' dave means `org-agenda-date-later'. I believe he's >> using my keybinding for this command... >> >>> I'm happy to hack something locally if the group doesn't agree, but moving >>> things around in the past seems like such a corner case that I thought maybe >>> this would be a better default behavior. >> >> I agree with Dave here. 'f' on a past-dated item maybe should move it today >> on the first press, and then into the future on subsequent presses. >> >> John >> >> >> > +1 > > Me too I sometimes run into this situation where I just want to shift past-dated items to today. > I never had a use case where I wanted to shift an item from "past" to "past+n-days > Rainer > > Well, as indicated somewhere else a "C-c C-s +1" for shifting to tomorrow or "C-c C-s ." for shifting to today does exactly what I wanted. "The power is in the house" already. Thank you, Rainer