From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julian Gehring Subject: Re: orgweb/Changes: broken formatting of code blocks Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 13:06:23 +0200 Message-ID: <4F8565AF.3010207@googlemail.com> References: <877gxmmuyf.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvNj-0005VP-9L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:06:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvNe-0006I0-DO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:06:34 -0400 Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41]:37489) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHvNe-0006Hj-3F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:06:30 -0400 Received: by bkwq16 with SMTP id q16so697782bkw.0 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:06:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <877gxmmuyf.fsf@altern.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Bastien, thanks, the formatting of the code block example looks fine now. Best Julian On 04/11/2012 12:19 PM, Bastien wrote: > Hi Julian, > > Julian Gehring writes: > >> at the changes page of the orgmode website, some of the code block >> formatting seems to be broken (see >> http://orgmode.org/Changes.html#sec-3). > > I recently pushed a fix for this. It looks okay to me know. > > Can you check again? > >> Can anyone please check if the attached patch would fix this? With my >> local setup, this yields a proper display of the code blocks. Or do the >> commas in front of the code lines have a meaning that I am simply missing? > > The content of the #+begin_src block is inserted as an example, which > looks the right thing to do to me. > > Thanks, >