From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Release 5.22 (Carsten Dominik Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:20:00 +0100 Message-ID: <50CBB9B1-B817-4F8B-BA25-45180EE4F289@science.uva.nl> References: <200802191705.m1JH5qll027622@bp34.u.washington.edu> <47BB19C0.2050508@u.washington.edu> <27254.1203446021@alphaville.zko.hp.com> <47BB2B3F.4070003@nabuli.de> <428F8D4B-88F4-4BE4-919C-1C000AB0BD66@science.uva.nl> <8763wjvqgp.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> <20080220122505.5170601c@renner> <87hcg3yhqn.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRnvn-00065e-9z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:20:11 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRnvk-00061T-QL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:20:10 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JRnvk-000614-7x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:20:08 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.171]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRnvj-0007Ko-UW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:20:08 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so784502ugf.48 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:20:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87hcg3yhqn.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Detlef Steuer , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On Feb 20, 2008, at 12:44 PM, Bastien wrote: > Detlef Steuer writes: > >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:04:38 +0000 >> Phil Jackson wrote: >> >>> Carsten Dominik writes: >>> >>>>>> +1 vote on that one. I haven't tried out 5.22 yet, but the >>>>>> M-RET/M- behavior that Scott describes, also fits my >>>>>> way of working perfectly. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Arghh ... me too ... so count me in on this vote for wanting to >>>>> having >>>>> it back ... please ... :-) >>> >>>> I'll fix this for the next release, but I am traveling for the next >>>> few days.... >>> >>> Any chance of making it configurable (default to the old >>> behavior)? I >>> like the new behaviour better, am I the only one? >> >> You're not alone! > > I do like the new behavior as well. > > One tiny problem, though: I wish the behavior of M-RET for list items > and table cells would be in sync with the one for headlines. Meaning what for table cells? - Carsten