From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBSw7ZobGVy?= Subject: Re: python sessions Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:42:12 +0100 Message-ID: <514A0304.9080809@easy-emacs.de> References: <51496061.20706@easy-emacs.de> <20524.1363795610@alphaville> <5149ED11.6000502@easy-emacs.de> <21887.1363800343@alphaville> <22562.1363803338@alphaville> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UINxS-0004wN-IZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:42:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UINwk-0004fL-I2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:41:54 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.9]:54529) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UINwk-0004fD-8R for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:41:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <22562.1363803338@alphaville> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Am 20.03.2013 19:15, schrieb Nick Dokos: > John Hendy wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: >>> Andreas Röhler wrote: >>> >>>> Seems `org-babel-execute':python doesn't get the session flag. >>>> >>>> Edebug: org-babel-execute:python >>>> org-babel-execute:python >>>> executing Python code block... >>>> [4 times] >>>> Result: ((:comments . #1="") (:shebang . #1#) (:cache . "no") >>>> (:padline . #1#) (:noweb . "no") (:tangle . "no") (:exports >>>> . "results") (:results . "replace output") (:hlines . "no") >>>> (:padnewline . "yes") (:session) (:result-type . output) >>> >>> Sure it does: ^^^^^^^^^^ >>> >>> What it does with it is another matter however. Am I missing something? >> >> I was thinking the concern was over not having the session named >> properly, but might be wrong (Andreas could confirm). >> > > I guessed Andreas tried with an unnamed session yes, tried the example given, ah, see misinterpreted the spot, thanks, Andreas