From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fredrik <fredrik@jumans.net>
Subject: Re: There can only be one item with priority 1?
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:54:57 +0100
Message-ID: <52EA75D1.4080604@jumans.net>
References: <52EA5887.3070002@jumans.net> <87iot1cvst.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56123)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fredrik@jumans.net>) id 1W8txA-0002O3-J8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:55:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fredrik@jumans.net>) id 1W8tx4-0002Df-J9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:54:56 -0500
Received: from mail.talkactive.net ([195.128.174.72]:28530)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <fredrik@jumans.net>) id 1W8tx4-0002Da-CZ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:54:50 -0500
Received: from se1-devel-90.a.snowmen.se (fw01d.snowmen.se [80.169.182.163])
	(Authenticated sender: fredrik@jumans.net)
	by mail.talkactive.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 59C672A0724
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:54:49 +0100 (CET)
In-Reply-To: <87iot1cvst.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

That would be an idea and I have tried it but when adding a new item in 
the list I manually need to change the priority for all the rest which 
is too much work

Regards,

Fredrik

On 2014-01-30 16:51, Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
> Fredrik <fredrik@jumans.net> writes:
>
>> When I think about priority I want to see if one item is more
>> prioritized then another. So if I have a list like this:
>>
>> * TODO Not important
>> * TODO Really important
>> * TODO Kind of import
>>
>> So setting in the priority would look like this :
>>
>> * TODO 3 Not important
>> * TODO 1 Really important
>> * TODO 2 Kind of import
>>
>> And adding a new item that is more important then kind of important
>> would look like this :
>>
>> * TODO 4 Not important
>> * TODO 1 Really important
>> * TODO 2 More important then kind of important
>> * TODO 3 Kind of import
>>
>> So is there any such functionality for handling priorities the anyone
>> knows of? I know there is the ABC but that doesn't support what I
>> shown here where I add an item in the middle of the list changes the
>> priority of everything below it?
> Why not use ABC and differentiate with tags, e.g.:
>
> * TODO [#C] Not important :low:
> * TODO [#A] Really important
> * TODO [#B] More important then kind of important
> * TODO [#C] Kind of import :medium:
>