From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Icalendar export and contacts
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 12:09:45 +0100
Message-ID: <56BF0EF9.2070406@gmx.de>
References: <56BCFD09.2030408@gmx.de> <874mde6ecr.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<56BD97D2.9030002@gmx.de> <87r3gh4kjt.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55582)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1aUY4W-0006cZ-Uu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 06:09:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1aUY4T-0005Jj-Pb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 06:09:04 -0500
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:59547)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <simon.thum@gmx.de>) id 1aUY4T-0005JR-Gn
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 06:09:01 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87r3gh4kjt.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

On 02/12/2016 11:43 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Simon Thum <simon.thum@gmx.de> writes:
>
>> I noticed one more strange thing:
>>
>> the new exporter fails to resolve links to radio targets (which are
>> slightly pointless but worked before). I'm not sure it needs fixing,
>> just thought I'd let you know.
>>
>> I.e. <<<fails>>>   <<works>>
>>
>> [[works]]
>> [[fails]]
>
> It doesn't need to be fixed. Radio targets bring their own linking
> mechanism.

Yes, but the exporter stalls on the [[fails]] link although it resolves 
in org. Provided you're right the reasoning seems off.

Cheers,

Simon