emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Anthony Lander <anthonylander@yahoo.com>
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Matti De Craene <mattidecraene@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] M-Right and M-Left behave differently on headings and list items
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:27:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <617476E8-E4A7-4FAA-83C5-9ED0597E3E8B@yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42881A23-3B5E-4423-B068-F543CE5B6AA7@gmail.com>


On 10-Apr-21, at 8:53 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:

> Hi,
>
> do others agree with Matti's view?
>

I agree. I think it would be better if the arrow keys behaved the same  
on a headline and on a list.

   -Anthony


> Thanks.
>
> - Carsten
>
> On Apr 20, 2010, at 12:29 AM, Matti De Craene wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> When operating on a heading, M-Right/M-Left promotes or demotes one
>> heading only, and M-S-Right/M-S-Left promotes or demotes an entire
>> subtree.
>>
>> When operating on list items however, there is no distinction between
>> M-Right/M-Left and M-S-Right/M-S-Left. Both key combinations operate
>> on the current item and on all subitems
>>
>> Example: No difference between M-Right and M-S-Right on item 1 below:
>> - item 1
>>   - item 2
>>   - item 3
>>
>> I find this behaviour somewhat confusing.
>>
>> Attached patch seems to fix that for me.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Matti
>> <M-right-M-left-on-list- 
>> items.patch>_______________________________________________
>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
>
> - Carsten
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-21 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-19 22:29 [Patch] M-Right and M-Left behave differently on headings and list items Matti De Craene
2010-04-21 12:53 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-04-21 13:19   ` Sébastien Vauban
2010-04-21 13:27   ` Anthony Lander [this message]
2010-04-21 13:32   ` Bastien
2010-04-21 13:54     ` Carsten Dominik
2010-04-21 14:04       ` Bernt Hansen
2010-04-21 14:44       ` Dan Davison
2010-04-22 16:02         ` Carsten Dominik
2010-04-23  8:26           ` Carsten Dominik
2010-04-21 20:27       ` Matti De Craene
2010-04-21 21:07         ` Carsten Dominik
2010-04-22 10:15           ` Bastien
2010-04-22 20:37             ` Matti De Craene
2010-04-23  8:26             ` Carsten Dominik
2010-04-26 22:07               ` Matti De Craene
2010-04-27  5:57                 ` Carsten Dominik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=617476E8-E4A7-4FAA-83C5-9ED0597E3E8B@yahoo.com \
    --to=anthonylander@yahoo.com \
    --cc=carsten.dominik@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=mattidecraene@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).