From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [babel] Globally assigning a value to a variable Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:22:23 -0400 Message-ID: <8458.1319224943@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <80lisew4w8.fsf@somewhere.org> Reply-To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49806) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHKfi-0008DS-Sz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:22:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHKfh-0004G6-U4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:22:26 -0400 Received: from g4t0015.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.18]:27070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RHKfh-0004Fv-ND for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:22:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message from "Sebastien Vauban" of "Fri, 21 Oct 2011 20:55:51 +0200." <80lisew4w8.fsf@somewhere.org> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sebastien Vauban wrote: > #+PROPERTY: var myvar="original" > > * Overview > > I would like to test a global variable assignment (just done here above) and > local ones (on the code block itself). It seems that the global value is not > "known". Though, maybe, I don't understand it fully yet. > > * Test code > > ** Using the local var > > #+srcname: test-local > #+begin_src sh :var myvar="canada-dry" > echo $myvar > #+end_src > > #+results: test-local > : canada-dry > > ** Using the global var > > I'm not passing anymore a local value, hence expecting the "global" value to > be used: > > #+srcname: test-global > #+begin_src sh :var anothervar="canada-dry" > echo $myvar > #+end_src > > #+results: test-global > (no output) > > Am I understanding correctly how it works / should work? > I think so and it works for me. Does C-c C-c on the #+PROPERTY: line and reevaluating the block help? Nick