From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: How to track down "No heading for this item in buffer or region."? Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:29:31 +0100 Message-ID: <8738xqpbo4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20130124123204.GB24543@boo.workgroup> <87y5fioimf.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20130124162311.GE24543@boo.workgroup> <87libipeot.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <4467.1359056138@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyTQY-0003O3-6B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:29:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyTQT-0005hR-7c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:29:38 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]:45119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyTQT-0005hE-1g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:29:33 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id d7so1807862wer.8 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:29:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4467.1359056138@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> (Nick Dokos's message of "Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:35:38 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: emacs-orgmode , Carsten Dominik Nick Dokos writes: > to try to reproduce Rainer's problem, when I first construct the agenda, > I get *both* the TODO and the no-heading message: text properties are not > active. If I then visit the file (e.g. RET on the TODO item) and construct > the agenda again, neither the TODO nor the no-heading message > appears. I see -- it was not obvious to me you were trying without opening the file in a buffer. With my patch, I can reproduce the error, but only the TODO (which appears instead of being skipped, not with the timestamp line. Yes, seems related to properties. I'll digg further. Thanks! -- Bastien