From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GPy3C6bgbF+ROgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:08:38 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id YCeyB6bgbF+1cAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:08:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62CB6940224 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 18:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50886 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLVfW-0000Zy-Un for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:08:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLVf1-0000Ze-S2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:08:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::436]:34482) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kLVez-0004TP-5o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 14:08:03 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id t10so129399wrv.1 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:08:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=MlOLPVCTQ0Mtnf17QV8g0x08kPCJjHUz862MJSUg9zM=; b=STOvzuIY7iba3IEIRfsu5M+nx6MjhjNi6X+AvZsg6M2tfTRhsgMAUtx2c2K3HnOJhS LWKURWbunSFAqi0j0uKv3SpBgR9+LHiT4Ya//Kuo/k3x9hlfhpfB6eUOCSxhXaIWCZKR ykfre+mgAuVlXP/CCYVfZjlurT86+hhwWwP+l3IOEXQhhLTgCNvjX/x2tBHrAWTVgtHC AsKyHN1FcgjmLH3VpN0LobULglUwAS/hgW7Bh8IAo14VvYkKWsFYyL1KKVNIyHrGqluW dOreO4tpYIzcXRIs1RIFgzmdsln/x1dxl1vZ3VqJELf4UACU5BU+ttYJCpid6fINBTWR TlQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=MlOLPVCTQ0Mtnf17QV8g0x08kPCJjHUz862MJSUg9zM=; b=hFTOwSGuuoOGCvap5i16QgDFpD8vNrtO52tSNxgX+f0q3gYsbNZXUI6vSon0Zrkdfs pEqJNSpiMmmtbIL8xoHjl9aoYwn21M+MCmnWKm9iUU8IpEvHilwPy/CwUNz0354im1Al eUV28cOOkcNbIU7DPm+xbiwpd2CCVDwn7UJpGlUYdcqVK77xNo2Dl7Ob2sBhE6dJIF6f 6wh8dXleFWVe81hClEU8CdsBTqhCB8hI2bLXnSpZldmpbW2rumKq8SRWqGWt+vJT1VOS 4q6Wkximfk+qAAaBeSEcxeYFzkjg4mEq+hYbDbOcSf+Rn8DK/1r4VPPuVxyAYSXvV7wo Q8vg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ad20ey1LpX99o9GzcTVDymfCkpMZJR2nkU9WHWMe/DkS4wqS9 iw7Gy7ZNxS1RRyU19yRf5L+P7ym7T7U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwq2TJrUT+YtMDvSrlIxq/35tGgxxniVN+DHpA3iZWo1jLyZCsPJImCfcwj7Kw8I5Xj6d0qgA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:a3d4:: with SMTP id m20mr129169wrb.29.1600970878958; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:07:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hirondell ([109.190.253.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n4sm82106wmc.48.2020.09.24.11.07.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:07:58 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin_Le_Gouguec?= To: Ihor Radchenko Subject: Re: [patch suggestion] Mitigating the poor Emacs performance on huge org files: Do not use overlays for PROPERTY and LOGBOOK drawers References: <87h7x9e5jo.fsf@localhost> <87r1vhqpja.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tv0d2nk7.fsf@localhost> <87o8qkhy3g.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87sgfqu5av.fsf@localhost> <87sgfn6qpc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87367d4ydc.fsf@localhost> <87r1uuotw8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mu5iq618.fsf@localhost> <87ftb9pqop.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <875zc2du63.fsf@localhost> <87wo4en8qk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mu31adeu.fsf@localhost> <871rkcbx40.fsf@kyleam.com> <87mu301in8.fsf@localhost> <87lfh5vvrp.fsf@localhost> <87sgbc4qpl.fsf@gmail.com> <87sgbaw58y.fsf@localhost> <87pn6ew2pv.fsf@localhost> <8736393tlw.fsf@gmail.com> <87eemtm1ic.fsf@localhost> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 20:07:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87eemtm1ic.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Wed, 23 Sep 2020 14:48:59 +0800") Message-ID: <875z83hwuc.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::436; envelope-from=kevin.legouguec@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x436.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=STOvzuIY; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.71 X-TUID: 4z9dVVc4NvTT Ihor Radchenko writes: > Thanks for reporting! I accidentally reintroduced the bug because of > mistake when converting org-hide-drawers to new folding library. > (:facepalm:). > > Should be fixed in the gist now. Can confirm, thanks! I understand from your answer to Bastien's query that this fix is specific to your branch; would it be hard to backport it to Org's maint branch? Otherwise IIUC Org 9.4 will keep this regression, and users will have to wait until Org 9.5 for a fix. Also, just in case there's been a misunderstanding: Bastien writes: > Can you share this gist as a patch against Org's current master? Bastien asked for the /gist/ as a patch against master, whereas your answer explained why you couldn't share the /fix/ as a patch against master. If Bastien did mean the whole gist, here is the corresponding patch against master: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/yantar92/6447754415457927293acda43a7fcaef/raw/7e43948e6c21220661534b79770bc1a6784b7893/featuredrawertextprop.patch Apologies if I'm the one misunderstanding, and thank you for all your efforts!