From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id sOmtNZSwk14eDQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 00:21:40 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id eJ3TDJewk15MMwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 00:21:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B241942CCF for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 00:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39056 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jNmr3-0002MB-B7 for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 20:21:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jNmqe-0002M3-Ay for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 20:21:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNmqd-0003nD-D1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 20:21:12 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x732.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::732]:44760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jNmqd-0003mk-9X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 20:21:11 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x732.google.com with SMTP id j4so7966096qkc.11 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:21:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=wODaODoEBNwSfZdjNaXpQ7EMldOpFvdTgKEHEdZNYcA=; b=mjonyXBlWinI6X2QkegA5XvyT0t/ty32AB/iIA6DSdYCxJeSrEti8bYn9NlYUS9XcX caCa+f1iSiV5ef5eFRcQd4Y07F5CjxbNaD5gj7LuVho2ri3E5SEokV38nLuulcC2IXzD lOVlD+YuAMOgzF1A1nyP3EIyZjjpChKh7kH8sJQshuyDL939Em/EttTYg6kX0xzNVZsN XLyPTfDMZ54xvDBoghHzYdz68oEHN80ktXY+NDvBmzrWa1W8hlU1pNAeryllOvwYyIjn jOletnB1Ky+nt017+YhYw5ZQbeyf532vYQDJKyIM17YRr+6tPSqdXmuwxmrE67FKrfWq II2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=wODaODoEBNwSfZdjNaXpQ7EMldOpFvdTgKEHEdZNYcA=; b=uWG/NCGInH+7zTdndvT0p0keDHx8CYbdPJEmWSARz8QK0TL7kDMZwwnWcqrOhUROo7 388Cw4AqMbRyDMKgESeXdoXr++scHnQ5pooV8kYmjsJCmnId4mSmFts0+dp4US2VvfLF pZUYTaIFLctk/WyWrB6DwZlDfXPLFFeszBqUmvspktgnapmSmmsFK2zuUneu0C/kmnsf vTuNjTzwZ5nPJk/tPzrfr9Xxq1drWk42OxVjtu9AzUmKJ65sk63N9ykeLMCwAfC6SfaJ I6fus1/A1dRNzSjRNQrcJ2uy2HBjyXsiA31FeMlxiEXjuG+XK/CkK+R+OlNw3qFpEuKJ wVRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZZHVwr/8ieTlRlmlDfzX0CdUCD92ZM5+HjzzTZAV+6C0rxYKj+ pBcaRI2+G0XrVeg5CkSeQv8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL7viJF4r3IBqh4xQYYfhdcGb/HhqPIS9llWNkKuxHnghfkAKIZusfOlxiGBUiWiVu5cciS+Q== X-Received: by 2002:a37:bd81:: with SMTP id n123mr13922846qkf.431.1586737270339; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gusbrs-laptop ([187.113.145.40]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g14sm7572000qtb.24.2020.04.12.17.21.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:21:09 -0700 (PDT) References: <87imjqdtpo.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8tim83q.fsf@kyleam.com> <87lfn5j5dz.fsf@gmail.com> <878sj42os2.fsf@kyleam.com> <87o8rx1cmf.fsf@kyleam.com> User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.3 From: Gustavo Barros To: Kyle Meyer Subject: Re: Bug: Repeating tasks no longer appearing on future dates in the agenda [9.3.6 (9.3.6-17-g389288-elpaplus @ /home/gustavo/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20200224/)] In-reply-to: <87o8rx1cmf.fsf@kyleam.com> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 21:21:04 -0300 Message-ID: <877dyki6bz.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::732 X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Bastien Guerry , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, hhkg@protonmail.com Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: 0.09 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mjonyXBl; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [0.09 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.57956980171184]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.51.188.0/24:c]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.29), country: US(-0.01), ip: 209.51.188.17(-0.58)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:-]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:209.51.188.0/24, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[gusbrs2016@gmail.com,emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[emacs-orgmode@gnu.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[bzg.fr,gnu.org,protonmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[gmail.com : SPF not aligned (relaxed),none] X-TUID: 4dpx+9TY+VFN Hi Kyle, On Sun, Apr 12 2020, Kyle Meyer wrote: >> I'll plan to revert the commit tomorrow. Please chime in if you >> disagree with me doing so. > > Reverted in 1de7eabf2. Thank you very much for this. I've already received the weekly build, and it looks good again. Hopefully a solution for the one-time delay issue which does not trigger this new problem can be found. But I concur (if I may) it was a wise decision to revert the commit in the meantime. Best, Gustavo.