From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Feature: Group and limit items in agenda Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:42:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87d2w6kier.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ip64z9rx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55367) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4up4-0004z7-On for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:57:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4up3-0001zA-M3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:57:34 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]:44940) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4up3-0001z4-G5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:57:33 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id r5so4841070wey.18 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:57:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Muchenxuan Tong's message of "Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:10:26 +0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Muchenxuan Tong Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Muchenxuan, Muchenxuan Tong writes: > My intention is to limit the number of tasks in each category. Did you check (info "(org)Block Agenda") ? That's the way I would suggest: define a block agenda listing the various categories, then use `org-agenda-max-todos' in each of them to limit the number of TODOs. > For the new proposed 'org-agenda-max-todos', I can only limit the > number of TODOs in the whole TODO lists. > > Maybe for what I want, it's desirable to add a auto-split or > auto-group features, where a list of TODOs, can be split further into > multiple lists of TODOs, by a certain criteria (tags, category). > > What do you think about it? I understand defining block agendas is not as straightforward than the solution you envision, but my feeling is that allowing grouping+limits will have too much overlap with the block agenda functionality. Let me know if you find the path to happiness with a combinaison of block agendas and the new variables. Thanks, -- Bastien