From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Finney Subject: Re: Gmane readers - please subscribe Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:53:21 +1000 Message-ID: <87d3xkjyn2.fsf@benfinney.id.au> References: <87wrvtkawl.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <87k4rtod4o.fsf@eku238261.eku.edu> <87ljc9jjqt.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <87iq7csxl4.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O6tev-0001qd-7w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:53:41 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35537 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6ter-0001oa-Od for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:53:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6tep-0006I2-VP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:53:37 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59021) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6tep-0006HW-P1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:53:35 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6tem-0002HE-RP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:53:32 +0200 Received: from eth595.vic.adsl.internode.on.net ([150.101.214.82]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:53:32 +0200 Received: from ben+emacs by eth595.vic.adsl.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:53:32 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sebastian Rose writes: > OK - there _must_ be a missunderstanding... Quite probably. But I don't wish to make further noise about a topic most here likely don't care much about, so I will try to make this my last message in this thread unless new information comes to light. > We all post via "reply all" to support unsubscribed users. They (you?) > couldn't discuss in realtime otherwise. In fact, many people in this thread have *not* done that, and I've read every message sent to the forum just fine. Gmane allows an NNTP interface to the forum; that's pretty much the point for me. If you are sending an extra copy to me specifically, please don't; it doesn't help. As for the many suggestions to set up authentication tokens that lie dormant: I have explained my position on proliferation of authentication tokens, and some people have understood. That's good enough for now. Let's get back to Org-mode discussions :-) -- \ “Dad always thought laughter was the best medicine, which I | `\ guess is why several of us died of tuberculosis.” —Jack Handey | _o__) | Ben Finney