From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Org-mode versus Taskpaper - now for real Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 11:26:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87ej9mhsx3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <0277B507-1486-4172-B1C6-1B73B84148DD@science.uva.nl> <47F4A997.4000109@calicojack.co.uk> <47F4F442.7060104@calicojack.co.uk> <87tzii3meg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <47F5136A.2080909@calicojack.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JhiCU-0002AQ-4U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 05:27:10 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JhiCR-00028x-Ic for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 05:27:09 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JhiCR-00028W-6e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 05:27:07 -0400 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.188]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JhiCQ-00067o-Io for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 05:27:06 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so4796606fkx.10 for ; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 02:27:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <47F5136A.2080909@calicojack.co.uk> (Rick Moynihan's message of "Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:27:06 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rick Moynihan writes: > For example, you *might* be able to convince your mum to use Taskpaper > but there's no way she'd ever use Emacs and Org-mode. I'd prefer my mum not to use or send me todo-lists! Even with a Org syntax. I'd been 20 years now that I try to convince her I'm not playing with computers, but working. Look like finally she was right all this time! -- Bastien