From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-latex-compile timestamp checks Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:14:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87fuxkhttk.fsf@gmx.us> References: <57F8EBE2-E535-423A-828B-BCB3A2B9F797@gmail.com> <87r3hjf3b9.fsf@gmx.us> <87vb6tblkr.fsf@gmx.us> <87k2n3jlzk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878u3jdj3m.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34557) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aOBtE-00009Y-Kb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:15:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aOBtB-0004pQ-AQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:15:08 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41659) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aOBtB-0004oh-3V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:15:05 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aOBt9-00017n-P6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:15:03 +0100 Received: from x590e0733.dyn.telefonica.de ([89.14.7.51]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:15:03 +0100 Received: from rasmus by x590e0733.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 23:15:03 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Anthony, >>>>> Eventually, I think at least ox-texinfo.el, ox-man.el and ox-groff.el >>>>> need a similar trick. >>>> >>>> Perhaps there should be an error check in ox-odt as well? I guess the >>>> only thing that could happen is that the zip/odt can’t be written, which >>>> could happen if it’s open in windows, which is extremely picky with locked >>>> files. [I have had to use a windows machine at work]. >>> >>> This makes sense, indeed. >>> >>> Would you want to take care of applying the patches and updating the >>> various export back-ends accordingly, or should I? >> >> My life is a bit stressful at the moment (deadlines). I'm happy to do it, >> and maybe I can do it in the weekend, but if you feel like taking doing it >> I won’t stand in your way. > > Just a friendly bump to make sure this doesn't get lost. I think the > LaTeX patches should still apply; let me know if there's an issue > tracker I could use to record the need for adjustments to other > back-ends. Short weekend... Thanks for reminding. Would you be interested in providing patches for the other backends? I’d be a bit troubled by fixing a general issue for one backend only. Rasmus -- I feel emotional landscapes they puzzle me