From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dev] footnotes improvements
Date: Sat, 14 May 2011 10:44:23 +0200
Message-ID: <87hb8x3c48.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <871v05f4ca.fsf@gmail.com> <4DCB89FA.9080500@christianmoe.com>
	<871v0444m9.fsf@gmail.com> <4DCBBAE1.9010106@christianmoe.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55179)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QLASf-00043g-8x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:44:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QLASe-00020i-4N
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:44:33 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:43041)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1QLASd-00020a-UQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 14 May 2011 04:44:32 -0400
Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2991142wyf.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 14 May 2011 01:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DCBBAE1.9010106@christianmoe.com> (Christian Moe's message of
	"Thu, 12 May 2011 12:48:01 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: mail@christianmoe.com
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com> writes:

> Anyway, the footnote markers are run together in LaTeX, too. So
> I think a (customizable?) separator would be a reader-friendly
> complement to this new adjacent footnote capability.

I've added three customizable variables for that:
- org-export-latex-footnote-separator (defaults to "\textsuperscript{,}\\,")
- org-export-html-footnote-separator (defaults to "<sup>, </sup>")
- org-export-docbook-footnote-separator (defaults to "<superscript>,
  </superscript>")

Would that make it?

I also fixed the ascii exporter which I had forgotten in the changes.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou