From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Finney Subject: Re: Gmane readers - please subscribe Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 23:51:26 +1000 Message-ID: <87hbmxj95t.fsf@benfinney.id.au> References: <87wrvtkawl.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <87k4rtod4o.fsf@eku238261.eku.edu> <87ljc9jjqt.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <87zl0pw186.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O6lCS-00020Z-01 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:51:44 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34873 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O6lCQ-0001zx-Nr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:51:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6lCM-0007Mx-TR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:51:42 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:36542) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6lCM-0007Mm-L6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:51:38 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O6lCL-0006uw-C6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:51:37 +0200 Received: from eth595.vic.adsl.internode.on.net ([150.101.214.82]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:51:37 +0200 Received: from ben+emacs by eth595.vic.adsl.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:51:37 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sebastian Rose writes: > Ben Finney writes: > > Since it's an infrequently-to-never accessed service, it's an > > unreasonable burden to expect the user to maintain unique > > passphrases for every such service. If for this list, why not for > > every such list? > > It's easy to maintain unique passphrases, and to create them. Having done so for many accounts and using many different systems for doing so, I can assure you that it's easier and more reliable to just avoid creating such accounts where possible. -- \ “I don't accept the currently fashionable assertion that any | `\ view is automatically as worthy of respect as any equal and | _o__) opposite view.” —Douglas Adams | Ben Finney