From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Org Babel resolution of `:var` value reference inconsistent Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 15:48:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87io5go62k.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <8737woetng.fsf@toshiba.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <874mh48roq.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34432) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuLoa-0006f1-Gt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 09:47:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuLoR-0005Vj-1j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 09:47:00 -0500 Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:45963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZuLoQ-0005Vc-S1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 09:46:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: ("Martin \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Carl\=C3\=A9\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=22's\?\= message of "Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:56:32 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Martin =?utf-8?Q?Carl=C3=A9?= Cc: Andreas Leha , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Martin Carl=C3=A9 writes: > On 2015-11-04 Wed 14:14, Andreas Leha wrote: > >> ,-----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- >> | > I'd say it is a bug if the results from evaluation differ between >> | > manual evaluation and during export. >> | > >> | > And even if it is not explicitely contradicting the manual [1] (which >> | > does not say anything about finding references), I'd prefer if >> | > references in COMMENT'ed sections are not found -- neither during ex= port >> | > nor during evaluation. This would be more inline with my intuition = of >> | > COMMENT is equivalent to # (which is also suggested by the fact that >> | > COMMENT is described in the section on #). >> `-----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- > > I'd like to strongly support this view. Fixed, in master (02c78501472fba94f8cf5a3d218b5c8845b28827). Thank you. Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou