From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: org-agenda-scheduled-leaders and repeating tasks
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 09:25:31 +0200
Message-ID: <87k2qmc5xw.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAL+-AofR3rk0AQbnO5V_GJJ8p_y0NJa=KW+TVJ3-E3pGXBt26w@mail.gmail.com>
	<87eggueq64.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAL+-AocgtXx-++NJBA8dFWCYWw2Z7h-r5hJ13SNAFj3+BnROoA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35387)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZnLqI-0008CQ-Ly
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 03:23:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZnLqH-0004Ym-Pf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 03:23:50 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:38268)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ZnLqH-0004XF-Ir
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 03:23:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAL+-AocgtXx-++NJBA8dFWCYWw2Z7h-r5hJ13SNAFj3+BnROoA@mail.gmail.com>
	(cesar mena's message of "Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:24:48 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: cesar mena <cmena@pobox.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

cesar mena <cmena@pobox.com> writes:

> Thanks!  Your approach works for me, buy won't it trip up someone who is
> used to the current behaviour?

I think the previous behaviour was buggy anyway. There is no such thing
as "all occurrences" for special repeaters. There may be any number of
occurrences, including zero, without a predictable pattern.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou