From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Org-mode ELPA repository package is not very updated? Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 12:54:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87lgp2ycl2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87tw3u8tt7.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60963) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIv4o-000773-B4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 06:54:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIv4n-0004VL-GI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 06:54:06 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:33388) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dIv4n-0004US-AY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 06:54:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: (numbchild@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 8 Jun 2017 18:47:52 +0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: "numbchild@gmail.com" Cc: Nick Dokos , Org-mode Hello, "numbchild@gmail.com" writes: > =E2=80=8B=E2=80=8B If so, the latest `ob-clojure.el` commits are bug fix = obviously. > > #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE > 7ed93eba5 * Fix incorrect argument call in ob-clojure.el > 98d672de3 * Update "25.2" defcustom :version's that remain in master > 0d3683f2c * Merge branch 'maint' > |\ > 713f78501 | * Update copyright years > 2c466ebff * | ob-clojure: Normalize :show-process syntax > cd4186c5c * | ob-clojure: Small refactoring > 56c0ce4a8 * | ob-clojure: Add :show-process > |/ > #+END_EXAMPLE > > I need the latest commit bug fix `7ed93eba5 * Fix incorrect argument call > in ob-clojure.el`. Apparently, this fix landed in master, so it should land in Org 9.1. It may be so because it sits on top of other modifications to ob-clojure that are not strict bug-fixes. Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou