From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: egallego@babel.ls.fi.upm.es (Emilio =?utf-8?Q?Jes=C3=BAs?= Gallego Arias) Subject: Re: (org-entry-properties nil 'all) does not return inherited properties Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:34:34 +0100 Message-ID: <87ocigdlz9.fsf@babel.ls.fi.upm.es> References: <20100322150100.GA21387@homac> <877hp48d4p.fsf@baal.ls.fi.upm.es> <20100322180630.GB26505@homac> <87vdcodss0.fsf@babel.ls.fi.upm.es> <20100322215622.GC26505@homac> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NtqCx-0006mz-Tj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:34:51 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40592 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NtqCv-0006mr-2O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:34:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtqCt-0001PP-Lg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:34:48 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:41746) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtqCt-0001PJ-Fv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:34:47 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NtqCr-0007OZ-Kc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:34:45 +0100 Received: from 150.red-88-14-25.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([88.14.25.150]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:34:45 +0100 Received: from egallego by 150.red-88-14-25.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:34:45 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Holger Macht writes: > This does exactly what I want, thanks for the pointer. However, I'm > missing the overview to know what impact this might have. Just for > reference: IMHO, this change should be safe to include. Regards, Emilio