From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Footnotes in the manual (hidden option?) Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 21:03:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87sh6rtoc8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <1526495158.1951.4.camel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56705) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJ1iC-0004MF-Uz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 15:03:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJ1i9-0005FC-Qv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 15:03:44 -0400 Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:52105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJ1i9-0005Eo-Kj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 15:03:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Kaushal Modi's message of "Wed, 16 May 2018 14:31:37 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Kaushal Modi Cc: Org-mode , ST Hello, Kaushal Modi writes: > I would think that's so because canonically Org mode using [fn:1] style. It > looks like you are manually typing the footnote refs and definitions. > > Try using C-c C-x f binding.. you will see that Org inserts the footnotes > in the documented style. > > I would say that the "fn"-style footnotes remove any kind of > ambiguity.. Moreover, [1]-like footnotes have been removed in 9.0. It's a bug if Org thinks [1] is a footnote. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou