From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ANN] BREAKING CHANGE -- removing #+BABEL file-wide property lines Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:18:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87sjm6hg4d.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87pqhrih3s.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkgvfhra.fsf@gmail.com> <2127.1319148505@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87vcrjfgt1.fsf@gmail.com> <80sjmmvm60.fsf@somewhere.org> <4EA129DB.4070006@christianmoe.com> <8762ji5jr6.fsf@gmail.com> <4EA1D4F9.5010302@christianmoe.com> <4ea1de9c.67b4ec0a.553d.122a@mx.google.com> <87aa8t10np.fsf@gmail.com> <4ea5a95b.059dec0a.606e.0c92@mx.google.com> <874nypkn6y.fsf@gmail.com> <87obwwkia5.fsf@gmail.com> <87boswk4vj.fsf@gmail.com> <8627.1320157576@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <9991.1320159724@alphaville.dokosmarshall.org> <87hb2nj2ic.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57742) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLZna-0004qq-HO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:20:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLZnZ-0003xp-A2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:20:06 -0400 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:51981) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLZnZ-0003sk-1C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 08:20:05 -0400 Received: by mail-wy0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 24so97999wyg.0 for ; Wed, 02 Nov 2011 05:20:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Rainer M. Krug's message of "Wed, 2 Nov 2011 12:12:06 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rainer M Krug Cc: nicholas.dokos@hp.com, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Rainer M Krug writes: > Then one should possibly also think of merging #+LATEX into #+PROPERTY - > which I think would make it more consistent (and this is a serious > suggestion). Are you sure you're talking about the "#+LATEX:" keywords, allowing to insert LaTeX code only for the LaTeX exporter? If that's the case, I fail to see your point. > So: all file-wide properties, #+PROPERTIES is used. "#+PROPERTIES:" isn't really about file-wide properties, but only about properties applying to each headline in the buffer. It's a generalization of the property drawers. That's quite different, actually. For example, "#+TITLE:" is a file-wide property that doesn't belong to "#+PROPERTIES:". In other words, a property should belong to "#+PROPERTIES" if it may have different values for different sections. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou