From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Bremner Subject: Re: DONE todo's in agenda view Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:26:18 -0400 Message-ID: <87tz7xtsyt.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca> References: <87y6xa9ceg.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca> <87hc3xu0xf.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <87wsct8xi2.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca> <87d4eltyoo.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> Reply-To: David Bremner Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LOKYa-0000Tb-SC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:26:24 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LOKYY-0000Rc-P0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:26:24 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57972 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LOKYY-0000RU-H5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:26:22 -0500 Received: from pivot.cs.unb.ca ([131.202.240.57]:41993) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LOKYY-0006Ty-8k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:26:22 -0500 Received: from bremner by pivot.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LOKYW-000790-JC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:26:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87d4eltyoo.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bernt Hansen Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bernt Hansen wrote: >Sorry for the confusion - I meant active timestamps _outside_ of the >DEADLINE: or SCHEDULED: entries. [snip] >but if I add an active timestamp to it like this it does show up >,----[ test.org ] >| * DONE Some task >| DEADLINE: <2009-01-10 Sat> CLOSED: [2009-01-17 Sat 16:19] >| - State "DONE" [2009-01-17 Sat 16:19] >| <2009-01-10 Sat> >`---- OK, thanks for explaining things for me. So it looks like I should use DEADLINE instead of plain timestamps. David