From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: FR: make C-c C-c for storing remember notes optional Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:22:07 +0000 Message-ID: <87wsrmr2w0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20071209124441.GG15129@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J1jWX-0004HD-0a for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:22:21 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J1jWV-0004Gv-Kk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:22:20 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1jWV-0004Gp-Ff for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:22:19 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J1jWV-0007gs-5o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:22:19 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so1169150nfh for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:22:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20071209124441.GG15129@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> (Adam Spiers's message of "Sun, 9 Dec 2007 12:44:41 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: org-mode mailing list Hi Adam, Adam Spiers writes: > Simple feature request: > > Could we make it optional whether C-c C-c is required to store a note, > on a per-template basis? This makes most sense when it is known in > advance that the only things which might need to be changed within the > template are already taken care of via %^{foo} prompts. So when all > the prompts have been entered, the final keystroke will store > the note immediately, rather than the user having to type C-c > C-c. I'm not sure about this. 1) It's convenient to be able to double-check the content of the *Remember* buffer before remembering it with `C-c C-c'. 2) What if there are several %^{prompt} and the user finally decided *not* to remember it? If the buffer is remembered at the final RET, then she won't be able to cancel the note with `C-c C-k'. 3) `C-c C-c' is really a call to a remember functionnality, not to an org ones. I guess it's not good practice to override the expected *general* remember behavior... What do you think? -- Bastien