From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>
Subject: annoying behavior in  orgtbl-mode
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:24:46 +0000
Message-ID: <87y3wvg7b5.fsf@mat.ucm.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46845)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1chDzy-0003J9-95
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:25:24 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1chDzu-0005YM-5q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:25:18 -0500
Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=39107 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1chDzt-0005XA-VJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:25:14 -0500
Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1chDzk-0002Sy-Rb
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:25:04 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi

Please consider the following table in an org buffer



|--------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----|
| Name   | E1a | E1b | E1c | E1d | E2a | E2b | E2c | Res |
|--------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----|
| Brauer |  10 |  20 |  10 |  10 |  30 |  10 |  10 | 100 |
| Smith  |  10 | 10  |     |     |     |     |     |     |
#+TBLFM: $9=$2+$3+$4+$5+$6+$7+$8

C-u C-u C-c C-c leads to 

|--------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----|
| Name   | E1a | E1b | E1c | E1d | E2a | E2b | E2c | Res |
|--------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----|
| Brauer |  10 |  20 |  10 |  10 |  30 |  10 |  10 | 100 |
| Smith  |  10 |  10 |     |     |     |     |     |  20 |
#+TBLFM: $9=$2+$3+$4+$5+$6+$7+$8

Which is ok. When I do the same in a latex buffer using orgtbl-mode I
obtain

\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{comment}
\begin{document}

% BEGIN RECEIVE ORGTBL test
\begin{tabular}{l|r|rrrrrrr}
\hline
Name & E1a & E1b & E1c & E1d & E2a & E2b & E2c & E1a + E1b + E1c + E1d + E2a + E2b + E2c\\ \hline
\hline
Brauer & 10 & 20 & 10 & 10 & 30 & 10 & 10 & 100\\ \hline
Smith & 10 & 10 &  &  &  &  &  & 20\\ \hline
\end{tabular}
% END RECEIVE ORGTBL test
\begin{comment}
#+ORGTBL: SEND test orgtbl-to-latex  :lend "\\\\ \\hline" :environment tabular
| /      |  <> |     |     |     |     |     |     |                                         |
|--------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----------------------------------------|
| Name   | E1a | E1b | E1c | E1d | E2a | E2b | E2c | E1a + E1b + E1c + E1d + E2a + E2b + E2c |
|--------+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----------------------------------------|
| Brauer |  10 |  20 |  10 |  10 |  30 |  10 |  10 |                                     100 |
| Smith  |  10 |  10 |     |     |     |     |     |                                      20 |
#+TBLFM: $9=$2+$3+$4+$5+$6+$7+$8
\end{comment}

\end{document}


Which is annoying. Is this a *bug*?

Regards

Uwe Brauer