From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: New exporter, beamer confusion Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:38:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87zjzfpud5.fsf@pank.eu> References: <20130204063905.GA23614@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87wqun5037.fsf@gmail.com> <6207.1360048864@alphaville> <87fw1ashw5.fsf@gmail.com> <878v728fo0.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87ip65mfv5.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwvhkqye.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <8738x8mhkg.fsf@gmail.com> <37646106030B4CA98C6A7717FBD89D50@gmail.com> <87vca4jigj.fsf@gmail.com> <48826909C0A84E91B223EF0A33E7D721@gmail.com> <877gmkgogt.fsf@gmail.com> <87vca4qcfw.fsf@pank.eu> <8738x7hk33.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38591) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3b3Y-0007iZ-RY for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:39:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3b3X-0007cK-M3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:39:04 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3b3X-0007cG-F9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:39:03 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U3b3n-0002Td-NT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:39:19 +0100 Received: from dynamic-adsl-94-34-145-173.clienti.tiscali.it ([94.34.145.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:39:19 +0100 Received: from rasmus by dynamic-adsl-94-34-145-173.clienti.tiscali.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:39:19 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas, > There is the #+LATEX_HEADER:. Is a keyword specific to Beamer > required? It would by symmetric with #+BEAMER: but I have never > needed it before. Something like #+LATEX_HEADER:\AtBeginSection[]{\frame{\thispagestyle{empty}\tableofcontents[currentsection]}} is not interesting to a LaTeX article output, but perhpas in a Beamer. Or it might want to use a more 'fun' font for my slides while sticking with kpfonts for the article version, e.g. #+BEAMER_HEADER:\usepackage[math]{anttor} #+LATEX_HEADER:\usepackage[light]{kpfonts} But perhaps (probably!) it could be sorted out on the LaTeX side, e.g. via beamerarticle. –Rasmus -- Vote for proprietary math!