From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: FR: make C-c C-c for storing remember notes optional Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:38:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87zlwhe1po.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20071209124441.GG15129@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <87wsrmr2w0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20071210222059.GB29684@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <87prxdtqiy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20071211121511.GA12375@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J26Fc-0003hA-UM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:38:24 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J26Fb-0003gi-7g for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:38:24 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J26Fb-0003gf-4e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:38:23 -0500 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.190]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J26Fb-0003HW-0v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 09:38:23 -0500 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so4026719mue for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:38:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20071211121511.GA12375@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> (Adam Spiers's message of "Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:15:11 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Adam Spiers writes: >> I think this would be nice. But I guess you see my point about >> cancelling : with a %^{prompt} it's possible to C-g, but not when there >> is no %^{prompt} -- which might be a bit dangerous.. > > It doesn't seem particularly dangerous to me: you still have the > option of 'undo' within the destination file, and even if you choose > not to, at worst you have a new entry which you can later delete. > It's not like you're at risk of losing existing data. That's right. Thanks for triggering this, I wish I had more time to work on this! >> I hope Carsten will soon stumble on this :) > > /me sends good system restoration karma to Carsten over the ether :-) :) -- Bastien