From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 0BlIMgwQtV+CHgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:14:04 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id kPY2LgwQtV87WAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:14:04 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A17BA940484 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44476 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfMLV-00052l-S0 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:13:57 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfMKt-00052Q-2X for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:13:19 -0500 Received: from hiwela.pair.com ([209.68.5.201]:48967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfMKr-0001Ld-7U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:13:18 -0500 Received: from hiwela.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hiwela.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175E798063D; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:13:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from minshall-entroware-apollo.cliq.com (unknown [95.8.197.123]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hiwela.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6B2F8F0953; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:13:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from apollo2.minshall.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minshall-entroware-apollo.cliq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCEF602F6; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:13:08 +0300 (+03) From: Greg Minshall To: Robert Pluim Subject: Re: patch to change org-adapt-indentation customization documentation In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:49:41 +0100." <87r1or570q.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <926417.1605701588.1@apollo2.minshall.org> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 15:13:08 +0300 Message-ID: <926418.1605701588@apollo2.minshall.org> Received-SPF: softfail client-ip=209.68.5.201; envelope-from=minshall@umich.edu; helo=hiwela.pair.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/18 07:13:10 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = FreeBSD 9.x or newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -11 X-Spam_score: -1.2 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Org-mode Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=umich.edu (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.91 X-TUID: owJtV7v5Cfpx hi, Robert, thanks. given that the docstring already talks about nil, t, 'headline-data ... should i eliminate those, just leaving "three" choices? ---- > "Adapt indentation for all lines" > "Adapt indentation for headline data lines" > "Do not adapt indentation at all" ---- or, leave mention of nil, t, 'headline-data, while trying to make clearer the binding of the longer descriptions in the docstring to the above short descriptions? i guess i see lots of emacs docstrings that talk of t, nil, etc. so, maybe it's not inappropriate for them to be in the docstring. (but, in which case, then i wonder, why not mention them also in the choices?) i'm happy to do the docstring thing. but, just wanted this clarification. cheers, Greg