From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Showing scheduled blocked tasks [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:51:53 +0100
Message-ID: <9C287CA8-8B1D-4DF0-A25A-238F15D2F8A7@gmail.com>
References: <E7CD5337-4E4C-482A-B7D6-3551FCFCEDD8@dsto.defence.gov.au>
	<E543ED0F-6FE7-45D9-9B3D-416BF416487A@gmail.com>
	<D40C7D08-0D14-47ED-BE10-13E1666DE274@dsto.defence.gov.au>
	<D25FD8A3-7CDE-4C06-8CC0-40EC8B3AB769@gmail.com>
	<2E4514CA-FE52-4608-B0A7-B2D99C2C0591@dsto.defence.gov.au>
	<3902E439-068D-43D6-9B29-BC409CFD41C5@gmail.com>
	<1C4ED174-A357-47BC-966A-193C3B1660BC@dsto.defence.gov.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NrRZI-0006LG-LS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:52:00 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46466 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NrRZH-0006KO-85
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:52:00 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1NrRZF-0005bP-Mr
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:51:59 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com ([209.85.218.219]:62853)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1NrRZF-0005b9-Fv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 03:51:57 -0400
Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so411974bwz.26
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:51:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1C4ED174-A357-47BC-966A-193C3B1660BC@dsto.defence.gov.au>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Matthew Phillips <Matthew.Phillips@dsto.defence.gov.au>
Cc: Matthew Phillips <matt@mattp.name>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On Mar 16, 2010, at 1:36 AM, Matthew Phillips wrote:

> On 16/03/2010, at 12:24 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
>> On Mar 15, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Matthew Phillips wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>> So, is there any way I can use a custom skip function in the TODO =20=

>>> block to remove blocked tasks? Is there a way of getting the =20
>>> blocked status of a task from such a function?
>>
>> Yes, BLOCKED is a virtual property which does this.  I think you =20
>> can just do a tags/property/todo search like this
>>
>> "-BLOCKED/+TODO=94
>
> That query still shows the blocked tasks, unfortunately.

My mistake:

+BLOCKED<>"t"/+TODO

This means that the BLOCKED property should not be equal to "t".

- Carsten

>
>> Or you can test for the BLOCKED property in a user-written skip =20
>> function.
>
> I=92ll follow this route next...
>
> Thanks very much for your help, Carsten.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew.
> IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence =20=

> Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the =20=

> CRIMES ACT 1914.  If you have received this email in error, you are =20=

> requested to contact the sender and delete the email.
>
>

- Carsten