From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [html] non-lists showing up as lists
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:05:47 +0200
Message-ID: <A738B5A8-B866-47F8-9812-1D6EE02159C3@gmail.com>
References: <87mwr78qpl.fsf@strey.biz>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44887)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1UjReB-00023b-FN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 06:05:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1UjReA-00062N-1U
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 06:05:51 -0400
Received: from ezel.ic.uva.nl ([146.50.108.158]:46443)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>) id 1UjRe9-00062B-FK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 06:05:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87mwr78qpl.fsf@strey.biz>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Michael Strey <mstrey@strey.biz>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On 3 jun. 2013, at 11:54, Michael Strey <mstrey@strey.biz> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> Just for completeness
> 
> Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
>> Possibilities:
>> 1. We could change the parser to ignore lists where the first
>>   item does not start with `1.' or `a)'.  But this would
>>   be a pretty serious change.
>> 
>> 2. We could implement a good function that could find problematic
>>   cases, so that they can be fixed by hand.  This is basically
>>   what Nick proposed - only it would be implemented in Lisp.
>> 
>> 3. We could implement a function that finds and fixes such issues.
>>   It would basically scan the buffer and find lists that have
>>   only a single item, not starting with 1, and change the wrapping
>>   to fix it.
> 
> 4. Define that lists alway have to have a newline in front of them.
> 
> 5. Define that lists always have to be indented.


Hi Michael,

I think this would break too many legacy Org files.  It would
also cause problems for sublist, so you could no longer
make compact deep lists.

But thanks for the input.

- Carsten

> 
> 
> My favourite would be 4.
> 
> 
> Michael Strey
> -- 
> mailto:mstrey@strey.biz
> http://www.strey.biz