From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Hendy Subject: Re: [OT] mail followup to (was Re: M-x fill-region equivalent for lists?) Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:40:49 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87a9ja4hio.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87li2svpdk.fsf_-_@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33677) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMgLf-0003YQ-8l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:40:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMgLa-0004Xi-Ex for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:40:55 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::234]:44366) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VMgLa-0004XY-9c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 11:40:50 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id wm4so9605779obc.25 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2013 08:40:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87li2svpdk.fsf_-_@ucl.ac.uk> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Hendy , emacs-orgmode On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote: > John Hendy writes: > >> P.S. Oddly, reply-all to your email composes an email to myself and >> the Org-mode list, but not you directly... what might be the cause of >> that? > > Hi John, > > that happens because I have directed, in my message, that any replies go > to the list. As I subscribe to the list, I do not need to have replies > to me directly. Scoring in gnus ensures that any email on the list that > is part of a thread I have contributed to will be emphasised (scored > high). > > The technical details: I have told gnus that any email in my lists.org > group is email from a mailing list. As a result, when I post to this > list, gnus inserts the following Mail-Followup-To: mail header in the > emails. If you look at this email, the header should be there and it > should look like this: > Gotcha, and sorry for incorrectly thinking this was wrong. I've never seen that before -- if I got an email from X, with Y and Z also on the email, it's always gone out to X, Y, and Z with reply-all, but then again, sending to Y doesn't mean that X is also getting it as in the case of you (X) and the mailing list (Y). Now I understand. > Mail-Followup-To: John Hendy , emacs-orgmode > > In principle, it could be just the org mode mailing list but it is not > up to me to decide whether you want direct responses or not. :-) > Got it. And now that you say that, *that's* what puzzled me when sending it out: I got an email back to myself. So *that* I still do find weird. If I send an email in response to your email on the list, why would I want it sent directly to myself? Is that just because if someone then responds to *that* email, it ensures that I get a direct email as well as the one to the list? >> This is the behavior I get with gmail. Just wanted to let you know. > > It's the correct behaviour. For once, gmail does the right thing! > I've not played with these followup headers, so interesting to get a bit of education about them. Thanks for explaining. John > Thanks, > eric > -- > : Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.3.50.1, Org release_8.1.1-7-gaecdf5 >