thanks. There is a later message to the list where I attached the patch. tim On 4 March 2017 at 23:04, numbchild@gmail.com wrote: > I already applied the patch at here: https://emacs. > stackexchange.com/questions/30857/clojure-code-evaluation- > in-org-mode-produces-no-output > > > [stardiviner] GPG key ID: 47C32433 > IRC(freeenode): stardiviner Twitter: @numbchild > Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36 CB99 B8C4 B8E5 47C3 2433 > Blog: http://stardiviner.github.io/ > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Tim Cross wrote: > >> With current 9.0.5 org-plus-contrib package, ob-clojure is broken and >> trying to evaluate clojure source blocks just gives a code block produces >> no output message. >> >> The problem is in the org-babel-execute:clojure function. This function >> has the following bit of code >> >> (setq result >> (nrepl-dict-get >> (nrepl-sync-request:eval >> expanded (cider-current-connection) (cider-current-session)) >> (if (or (member "output" result-params) >> (member "pp" result-params)) >> "out" >> "value"))) >> >> The problem is in the call to nrepl-sync-request:eval. The documentation >> states for this function >> >> (nrepl-sync-request:eval INPUT CONNECTION &optional NS) >> >> Send the INPUT to the nREPL server synchronously. The request is >> dispatched via CONNECTION. If NS is non-nil, include it in the request. >> Note the last optional argument NS. This is supposed to be a clojure >> namespace. However, the org-babel-execute:clojure function is calling this >> function with the output from cider-current-session, which returns a unique >> ID representing the current session. As a result, the call is returning a >> data structure with an error and no output (perhaps some error handling is >> required). The returned result is >> >> (dict status (namespace-not-found done error done state state) id 17 >> session 43e9fd6c-82ed-49fe-9624-0cfc6f56f8b1 changed-namespaces (dict) >> repl-type cljclj) >> >> Note the namespace-not-found >> >> Either the argument should be a call to (cider-current-ns) or perhaps it >> should just be left out as I don't see how you can pass the namespace as >> part of the block evaluation. >> >> >> -- >> regards, >> >> Tim >> >> -- >> Tim Cross >> >> > -- regards, Tim -- Tim Cross