From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Wales Subject: Can org regenerate the cache automatically? Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:24:41 -0700 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52692) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UqteG-0001ZB-GR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 19:24:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UqteE-0003H9-J4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 19:24:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]:49128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UqteE-0003GH-Dk for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 19:24:42 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id k10so2040895wiv.7 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 16:24:41 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org When Org says this: "Please regenerate the refile cache with `C-0 C-c C-w'" I wonder if it makes sense to: 1) regenerate the cache automatically - probably usually the user still wants to refile 2) for a massive increase in speed, ONLY regenerate it for whichever file is out of date Thanks. Samuel -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. ANYBODY can get it. Denmark: free Karina Hansen NOW.