From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Poll: Who is using these commands Date: Sun, 9 May 2010 17:24:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100508202159.GA32505@taupan.ath.cx> <4BE5DF9C.909@gmail.com> <245881E6-B69D-4E6F-A1B1-C4EFA39AF7BC@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1OB8Mk-0001BD-WE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 11:24:27 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56968 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OB8Mi-00019v-5K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 11:24:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OB8Me-0005Fa-Px for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 11:24:22 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f214.google.com ([209.85.219.214]:35923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OB8Me-0005FU-KK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 09 May 2010 11:24:20 -0400 Received: by ewy6 with SMTP id 6so947485ewy.32 for ; Sun, 09 May 2010 08:24:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On May 9, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Leo wrote: > On 2010-05-09 12:43 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> what do you think about C-M-f, C-M-b, C-M-n, C-M-p as alternative >> bindings? These seem to make *a lot* of sense, because, as many here >> have pointed out, they are so much better repeatable (Keep C-M- down, >> press the character.) > > It is terrible idea to override these parenthesis movement bindings. > They are universal in all editing modes that if overridden people who > also use other emacs packages will be surprised. For example to move > from a open parenthesis to a closing parenthesis. Isn't this a legitimate case for overwriting these? The outline structure is a hierarchical structure which can be traversed in a similar way as the parenthesis structure in Lisp code.... Emacs major mode conventions allow overwriting general commands when this makes sense for the mode and executed similiar functionality. I am no exper here, so please tell me if this would be a reasonable interpretation or not. - Carsten > > However, it makes sense to bind C-M-a and C-M-e to move the the > beginning/end of a subtree. > > I don't use these org movement bindings much because isearch does the > job perfectly and it can be used everywhere. > > Leo > > -- > CCL-USER> _ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode - Carsten