From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: Re: Sourceforge community award Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:16:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4AA80F05-FECC-427D-BD20-E5AD3F273C1E@gmail.com> <4A2F52EA.6080105@gmail.com> <87bpouo9v6.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87my8ejs14.fsf@mean.albasani.net> <871vppdfm0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <9EFC949C-F296-4793-8608-8D833DDC3F36@agfa.com> <228E7006-BC04-4A96-B5AB-FD705CD432A4@agfa.com> <873aa591vt.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fxe5vbqh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <421EFFE1-B5FC-4096-B6BE-D8B351E93FE5@agfa.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MF7Yn-0003uj-C9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:16:49 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MF7Yi-0003qy-1w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:16:48 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55881 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MF7Yh-0003ql-RA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:16:43 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f225.google.com ([209.85.219.225]:51086) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MF7Yh-000311-SV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:16:44 -0400 Received: by ewy25 with SMTP id 25so1512435ewy.42 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:16:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <421EFFE1-B5FC-4096-B6BE-D8B351E93FE5@agfa.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: peter.frings@agfa.com Cc: Bastien Guerry , emacs-orgmode Org-Mode Thank you all for this discussion and contribution! I am at a loss which we should choose now. I have put the pictures both on orgmode.org/i.html lets have a vote, or some more discussion. - Carsten On Jun 12, 2009, at 3:46 PM, peter.frings@agfa.com wrote: > > On 12 Jun 2009, at 15:10, Bastien wrote: > >> peter.frings@agfa.com writes: >> >>>> Take 4: >> >> Mhh.. yes! I like it more like that. One small (last?) request: >> would >> it be possible to have a light grey color instead of the white band >> on >> the right? I think it would be faithful to the idea, while being >> more >> visually sound. > > You mean like this? > > Take 5: > >