Hi, I have noticed that you can only have one [/] or [%] in a headline. Like in: ,---- | * TODO [/] [%] foo | - [ ] a | - [ ] b `---- Only the [%] will be updated. In an older version of org I used to use both in the same headline and it worked. Is there some reason for this "regression"? Thanks, Richard
On Jan 28, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote: > Hi, I have noticed that you can only have one [/] or [%] in a > headline. > > Like in: > > ,---- > | * TODO [/] [%] foo > | - [ ] a > | - [ ] b > `---- > > Only the [%] will be updated. > > In an older version of org I used to use both in the same headline and > it worked. Did that really ever work???? > Is there some reason for this "regression"? No, no reason, and progress has reversed regression in the GIT repo. - Carsten
>>>>> Regarding 'Re: only one [/] or [%]?'; Carsten Dominik adds:
> On Jan 28, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:
>> Hi, I have noticed that you can only have one [/] or [%] in a
>> headline.
>> In an older version of org I used to use both in the same headline
>> and it worked.
> Did that really ever work????
Yes, I'm pretty sure of that because I always used it that way. :)
>> Is there some reason for this "regression"?
> No, no reason, and progress has reversed regression in the GIT repo.
:)
I think this feature could be added with a one-line change in
org-list.el "(defun org-update-checkbox-count (&optional all)"
,----
| OLD: continue-from (point-at-bol)
| NEW: continue-from (or beg-cookie (point-at-bol))
`----
So now you can have:
,----
| ** TODO [1/2] [1/2] [1/2] --- YIKES --- [1/2] [1/2] [1/2]
| - [X] foo
| - [ ] bar
`----
Please include this if you like it.
--
Udv, Richard
Hi,
something like that is already in, since yesterday, both
for TODO items and for checkbox lists.
Thanks!
- Carsten
On Jan 29, 2009, at 11:47 AM, Richard KLINDA wrote:
>>>>>> Regarding 'Re: only one [/] or [%]?'; Carsten Dominik adds:
>
>
>> On Jan 28, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:
>>> Hi, I have noticed that you can only have one [/] or [%] in a
>>> headline.
>
>>> In an older version of org I used to use both in the same headline
>>> and it worked.
>
>> Did that really ever work????
>
> Yes, I'm pretty sure of that because I always used it that way. :)
>
>>> Is there some reason for this "regression"?
>
>> No, no reason, and progress has reversed regression in the GIT repo.
>
> :)
>
> I think this feature could be added with a one-line change in
> org-list.el "(defun org-update-checkbox-count (&optional all)"
>
> ,----
> | OLD: continue-from (point-at-bol)
> | NEW: continue-from (or beg-cookie (point-at-bol))
> `----
>
> So now you can have:
>
> ,----
> | ** TODO [1/2] [1/2] [1/2] --- YIKES --- [1/2] [1/2] [1/2]
> | - [X] foo
> | - [ ] bar
> `----
>
> Please include this if you like it.
>
> --
> Udv, Richard