From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id IBnhFwRnqV/QagAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 15:57:56 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id EJXJEwRnqV8rRwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 15:57:56 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFABD9402B5 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41974 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kc9YI-0003AM-Gr for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:57:54 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39038) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kc9UY-0000rL-1j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:54:02 -0500 Received: from grinta.net ([109.74.203.128]:43944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kc9UT-00063y-U4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:54:01 -0500 Received: from black.local (guests.bs.ptb.de [192.53.103.10]) (Authenticated sender: daniele) by grinta.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 141E0EDAA1 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 15:53:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=grinta.net; s=2020; t=1604937233; bh=naVT6noVXHUPzRgDjwSGC5M1JGvZl+JJX7g/tL5As20=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=l+ZamLF0J7vB4ZZIC4rIOFfs8cG015xfMrMPOY//oTZULQ4jZjyQGrQepATJnkekR 0WgYuwrw2Jiy8Itj27N5M+MxaO9iASmuAdaNrhUtWsc3rslg9g0d4vl0q8OLraYjyA vGtJyD2iqVp/ZdyrhrFzP2x/yAKq21jXTJmu7hH9B/2VM52kna4jdUFof2tiJWSW+e BmeaosddCsWVCsuxGs+VaTY9jm/RA2viJZEyzp0L6VDZS+Oh7a2xc6ZC0f/GxnhnTl GOQK0O1OUPuALq74kECeZf9lJpDJuv2fmq0MAVnk6bwutgEVK3BHBFQwBjMkp+y8vH HNFC4btFx1YWw== To: Org Mode List From: Daniele Nicolodi Subject: org-sbe results in two prompts for each evaluated cell Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 16:53:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=109.74.203.128; envelope-from=daniele@grinta.net; helo=grinta.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/09 10:53:53 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=grinta.net header.s=2020 header.b=l+ZamLF0; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: peEYnMpAKiRS Hello, using the org-sbe macro to evaluate a code block with table cells as input results in two prompts for each cell evaluated: one to confirm the evaluation of the code block passed as an argument to org-sbe and one to confirm evaluation of the code block dynamically generated by org-sbe. Is this by design or is it an unwanted consequence of how org-sbe is implemented? I think the second prompt is redundant, not very useful, and actually confusing because, unless they go digging to see how org-sbe is implemented, the user is not aware that another hidden code block is involved in the computation. Would a patch that removes the second prompt be something desirable? Thank you. Cheers, Dan