From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id /3ilDvjhq1+VHwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:07:04 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id 0FszCvjhq1/NegAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:07:04 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75DFC94053D for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:42348 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcpq0-0007rp-Pt for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:07:00 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcpp0-0007ox-Jz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:05:59 -0500 Received: from grinta.net ([109.74.203.128]:48852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcpoy-0008NM-GK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:05:58 -0500 Received: from black.local (unknown [78.159.96.193]) (Authenticated sender: daniele) by grinta.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C6BA3E61EE for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 13:05:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=grinta.net; s=2020; t=1605099951; bh=zcPo9dsYp975Sj17i1cvZ6qkzrpFBvoiZ/4T6d6iwAM=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=lNkykieAVqUnon7wO6C8RcnLL5z5pz+JIP2TSSLY9NhVrmFlLpncVkIzZa78fvLE7 eA1gpMV8XuafbAFC8IQCVyrp5eHEoYDEH/ozGFKTE90PZ1FkntHK2eNd8nUdmd7/Sx fbNwODF4WvdIb/9SSNXYsrBEjXNJSUEqFbI+MFtKA7ATp0hYa8ovvgdQa5cUOOOnSn 66IgcgFUwiwigHmKSjPA0d9HkbGnm0EiTi0I0f7Uv+uZ1oG8WaMsx1CrVv4VWtgvBW Yp/j0xbcAYv7e5rYAg0mcoyZmKsL8IhMkYkjRjm7kpLaGIsiD92+Jlu8Id30ET3lSO G1o/7MlHMASmw== Subject: Re: official orgmode parser To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org References: <68dc1ea1-52e8-7d9e-fb2d-bcf08c111eca@intrepidus.pl> <874kno7w3v.fsf@gnu.org> <87sg9g9rva.fsf@gnu.org> From: Daniele Nicolodi Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:05:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87sg9g9rva.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=109.74.203.128; envelope-from=daniele@grinta.net; helo=grinta.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/11 08:05:52 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=grinta.net header.s=2020 header.b=lNkykieA; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: /9P3xvSO7/kB On 11/11/2020 10:15, Bastien wrote: > Hi Daniele, > > Daniele Nicolodi writes: > >> Would it make sense to have one "official" (or a set of) org-mode test >> files and the corresponding syntax tree as parsed by org-elements (maybe >> in a format easier to read from other programming languages than >> s-expressions, json maybe?) to make testing other parser against the >> reference implementation easier? > > I think it is a very good idea. > > The example file would be also good to help users track for small > syntactic changes, when they happen. > > Would you like to work on such a file? I don't have enough motivation to see this climb high enough in my TODO list to see any meaningful progress in a reasonable time frame. I am mote than happy to contribute to Org, but it is more effective to keep these contributions related to my daily use of Org. Cheers, Dan